Over the decades and centuries (the very first 'scholarly journals' in the sciences started to appear in the 16th century!), scientific articles have developed a specific format. In 1979, the crucial parts of this format were given an official acronym: 'IMRaD'.
This acronym makes it easy to remember to the sections which should be included in any research article:
A majority of research articles published in the sciences follow the same format and have the same components (IMRaD is the 'core', but there are other sections, too):
Scanning an article for these seven components will help you determine if the article you are looking at is indeed a research article.
"Peer-Review" is an integral part of scholarly communication - before a research paper someone has written can be published...a peer-reviewed journal requires it to be reviewed and critiqued, usually by three other researchers the same field.
If the reviewers' general opinion is that the research was done properly, the conclusions drawn by the researcher(s) were reasonable, it may be published fairly quickly. Other times reviewers may recommend that the author(s) clarify their article's writing or conclusions, or even that they think a few additional experiments are needed to strengthen their evidence and conclusions, before it will be ready to be published.
In this way, peer-review is a built-in 'quality control' method in research, a type of 'gatekeeping' system - experts judging the work of other experts.
Some common types of peer review are:
Many, but not all, academic science journals are peer-reviewed. So how can you be sure if you've found a peer-reviewed article?
Many of our databases, and Ram Search (which searches multiple databases at one time) allow you to limit search results to content from peer-reviewed journals only.
Not all content in a peer-reviewed journal is peer-reviewed. The editorials, letters to the editor, and book reviews are typically not peer-reviewed.
Absolutely.
First and foremost, there are:
But there can also be: